Impact of Social Media on Society

Open Board
· 4 followers
William FanRC Yu
Jordie Li3 days ago
social media

Social media negatively affects adolescent girls in particular

This 2022 study (a cross-sectional and longitudinal dataset analysis) found social media use is associated with negative impacts among adolescents – and especially younger adolescent females.

The association seems to be weaker for adults.

Side point: the authors had initially done another broader study, focusing on screen time (including social media but also other activities like video calls, homework).

This initially study didn't find any meaningful effects (between screen time and wellbeing). Following some debate, the authors conducted the 2022 study -- that was more specific to social media.

From Orben et al. 2022. The higher the social media use, the lower (generally) the "life satisfaction score" -- especially for girls.
1
RC Yu5 days ago

Tldr: "screen time" broadly speaking not inherently good or bad, depends on the specific activity (including social media for e.g.).

RC Yu5 days ago
Parentingscreen time

Is "screen time" bad?

As a parent, I wonder if screen time is bad. I came across this study, that seems to be widely debated.

The study basically analysed some large datasets, to examine whether screen time negatively affected teens (controlling for various factors).

What they found: basically almost no effect.

Caveats:

  • "screen time" is a huge category: it could include social media doomscrolling, but it could also include doing homework on a computer.

  • also, the study didn’t separate how screen time may affect different teens differently (e.g. boy vs girl, different ages).

Subsequent papers have delved deeper, and indeed found not all screen time is harmless.

Thoughts:

  1. screen time per se is not necessarily good or bad. We need to look into the specific screen activity.

  2. I still worry about eye sight though (kids staring at screens will have worse eyesight?). Need to explore more papers!

0

Join the social media for nerds.

Where sources matter.

Continue with Email

Have an account? Log in

William Fan21 days ago

Social Media and Child Safety

It was recently reported that Meta was ordered to pay $567M in additional fines for an abatement program in New Mexico due to its failure to warn the public about its platforms' risks to children. The fines were in addition to $375M ordered against Meta for a similar earlier claim in New Mexico. This marks the largest child safety ruling against Meta and will have reverberations for social media companies in the future.

The court case ruled Meta acted as a public nuisance infringing on the health and safety of the public "knowingly" and "without lawful authority". The state built its case around these 10 components:

  1. New Mexico is experiencing a youth mental health crisis.

  2. Problematic social media use is a cause of the youth mental health crisis.

  3. Meta’s platforms are widely used in New Mexico.

  4. Meta implemented platform features that were designed to maximize engagement and time spent on its platforms, for all users and for teenage users in particular.

  5. Meta’s engagement features encourage and facilitate problematic interactions between adults and children.

  6. Harm caused by Meta’s products affects a significant number of people in New Mexico.

  7. Although many social media platforms compete for the attention of New Mexico’s youth, Meta’s platforms rely on methods for optimizing engagement that disproportionately impact education and interpersonal relationships

  8. Meta and its platforms provide a valuable service in New Mexico despite these harms, and it is not the only social media company impacting youth.

  9. Meta knowingly designed its platforms to maximize engagement, including in ways that are harmful to teenagers, and does not adequately disclose the risks of harm to its users.

  10. Meta’s conduct is a cause of and significantly contributes to the youth mental health crisis in New Mexico.

Deep dive into evidence of harm towards youth

The court case itself didn't provide any specific papers as far as I can tell, only references to HHS advisories, reports, and internal Meta research. The evidence was built on expert testimony, which the court found strong enough to state:

Even without the evidence and testimony that certain percentages of youth ... would not have those conditions but for social media use, the highly probable result of Meta's engagement optimization practices ... is that such practices would increase anxiety, depression, and sleep deprivation among teenagers.

The experts on both sides provided counter testimony on their view of the connection between social media and harm to youth. Dr. Jean Twenge testified that

most longitudinal studies confirm that adolescents’ social media use leads to depression ... and that experimental studies show that people who eliminate or reduce social media are less lonely and depressed, which further confirms the causal path between social media and teen mental health harms.

While the evidence wasn't listed, a 2022 study Social Media and Mental Health backs this testimony showing that the arrival of Facebook on college campuses lead to worse student mental health. The HHS advisory on Social Media and Youth Mental Health also listed this 2019 JAMA Psychiatry study.

Meta on the other hand pointed to a 2024 consensus report on Social Media and Adolescent Health which pointed to other factors causing overall mental health decline and a complex role social media plays in society.

My take

There does seem to a slew of evidence pointing to correlation between social media and declining mental health with teens and adolescents. Additionally, the ability for online predators to connect to underage minors is also blatant. Arturo Bejar, who worked as Meta’s Senior Director of Engineering in charge of the Protect and Care team stated:

the product is very good at connecting people with interests, and if your interest is little girls, it will be really good at connecting you with little girls.

But I agree with the primary conclusion from the Social Media and Adolescent Health report. There are benefits that are associated with social media including connection to friends and combating isolation, civic engagement, learning, and self expression.
The issue arises when we try to simplify the debate to net benefit or harm. Instead, its better to consider the piecemeal impacts and combat clear harms while retaining clear benefits. I don't think its helpful to see social media as a pure harm, just the same I wouldn't categorize screens and screentime as a pure harm.

2
RC Yu17 days ago
mental wellbeing

This UK study (comparing 20 schools with phone bans vs 10 without) found phone bans in schools didn't improve/affect mental wellbeing. But it also found that:

students who spent more time on their phones and social media—no matter the school policy—had worse mental health, slept less, were less active, behaved worse in class, and did less well in school.

There could be some reverse causation going on, but not a surprising finding.

(This was before UK banned social media for kids under 16.)

Kris Willow17 days ago
Parentingmental health

Do phone bans in schools work?

Most parents have some concerns about phone use. This is an interesting study from the UK, that investigated phone bans in schools.

The study covered 30 schools (20 had phone bans, 10 didn't), with the students aged 12-15.

Their main finding: phone bans don't meaningfully affect/improve mental wellbeing.

Basically the phone bans only reduced phone and social media use slightly, and kids still used their phones at home.

Important point: the phone bans weren't uniform or super strict in all cases -- e.g. some schools just told students keep their phones in their bags.

So we can't say that "phone bans will NEVER work". They just didn't have a huge impact, on average, in the way they were implememted in those 20 schools.

0
Kris Willow21 days ago
social media

Social media and youth

Cool Board! This seems like an important overview on social media use and youth – given some countries have now banned social media use for those below 16. As expected, mixed findings:

The paper shows that social media can help teens connect and learn, but it can also cause problems like stress and sleep loss if not used carefully. (from the Credo summary)

Given the benefits, I wonder if banning is too blunt a tool; but you could say on the whole it's better. Also, this particular study is US-focused.

Let's dig into more research on this Board!

0
RC Yu21 days ago
social media

Facebook worsened college students' mental health

Thought this study (highlighted in a prior post) was interesting. The researchers found:

Comparing our estimates to the most closely related ones in a meta-analysis by Paul and Moser (2009), we find that the impact of introducing Facebook at a college on mental health is around 22 percent of the effect of job loss.

A really useful comparison, to give readers an understanding of the magnitude of impact (of Facebook on mental health).

Also from a methodological point of view, a classic diff-in-diff study that could be taught in econometrics / stats class.

Caveat that the study uses somewhat older data (by design), so it may not reflect today's impact.

0