Journal Article
Development as (In)Justice: The Case of Namibia
Henning Melber•2025
Laura CamfieldUma Kothari
Top 4% · 96th Percentile
1 citations · Literature and Literary Theory
Open Access

TLDR

Past land seizures still shape who benefits from development in Namibia. Projects and agreements should deliver real benefits to marginalized people and treat fairness between generations as important.

Summary

1 Study Aim

The authors examine how colonial land dispossession (the taking of land under colonial rule) continues to affect marginalized communities in Namibia and limits restorative justice (efforts to repair past harms). They consider unequal land redistribution, a German-Namibian reconciliation agreement, and a planned project to produce green hydrogen, a proposed energy product. Using decoloniality (challenging structures inherited from colonial rule), they argue that justice requires addressing material inequality. The authors want development to improve people’s lives and treat generations fairly.

2 Study Design

The authors present a critical analysis of Namibia’s land inequality, the reconciliation agreement, and the planned hydrogen project. They interpret these issues through restorative justice and decoloniality, focusing on how social structures maintain material inequality. The provided description does not identify a participant sample or specific data-collection method. They examine three issues to understand whether development can help people who have been left out.

3 Findings

The authors argue that reconciliation and development cannot deliver restorative justice without substantive changes to structures that sustain material inequality. They warn that the planned mega-project (a very large development project) poses threats to marginalized communities. They advocate a pluralist (recognizing different perspectives) vision of justice that delivers material benefits and supports intra- and inter-generational justice (fairness within and between generations). Development should share its benefits fairly and avoid harming people now or in the future.

Abstract

This article critically examines the ongoing legacy of colonial land dispossession and its impacts on marginalized communities to reveal the limitations to achieving restorative justice. We focus on the unequal (re)distribution of land, the German Namibian reconciliation agreement and the threats posed by a planned German Namibian mega-project to produce green hydrogen, to advocate for development that delivers material benefits to marginalized groups and ensures intra- and inter-generational justice. Using the lenses of decoloniality and restorative justice, we argue that true decolonization requires commitment to substantive change through addressing the social structures that perpetuate material inequalities. We argue for a more pluralist, decolonial vision of justice to inform debates on restorative justice and to address these material inequalities.