Journal Article 2 Mentions
Colonial global economy: towards a theoretical reorientation of political economy
Gurminder K. Bhambra•2020
Top 1% · 99th Percentile
304 citations · Sociology and Political Science
Open Access

TLDR

The world economy did not develop separately from colonial rule. Connections and harms created through empire helped build it and still shape it today.

Summary

1 Study Aim

Bhambra seeks to rethink political economy (the study of how power and economic life interact) by making colonial relations (power relationships formed through colonial rule) central to explanations of capitalism (an economic system organized around investment and production). She argues that theories must include colonial history and its continuing effects. How we explain the world economy must include the history and lasting effects of colonial rule.

2 Study Design

The article presents a theoretical argument rather than reporting a new dataset or experiment. Bhambra considers standard explanations that focus on market expansion or changing social relations of capitalist production (how work and ownership are organized). She argues for examining these histories alongside colonial relations. The author rethinks familiar explanations by bringing colonial history into the picture.

3 Findings

Bhambra argues that dominant accounts wrongly treat capitalism as a separate system that began within Europe and North America. The study maintains that colonial connections helped form modern capitalism and remain important to how the global economy continues to function. It calls for political economy to be reshaped to take these relationships seriously. Colonial rule helped create the world economy, and its effects have not disappeared.

Abstract

Standard accounts of the emergence of the modern global economic order posit its origins in the expansion of markets or in the changing nature of the social relations of capitalist production. Each fails to acknowledge the significance of colonial relations underpinning these processes, as formative of, and continuous with them. This is a consequence of the dominant understandings (across different theoretical perspectives) of capitalism as a distinct and self-contained economic formation of modernity, the origins of which are seen to be endogenous to Europe and north America. As such, there is a concomitant failure to acknowledge, or regard as significant, the global connections forged through colonialism that are the condition of capitalist-modernity. I argue for the need to recognize the significance of historical colonial relations to both the establishment and continued reproduction of global political economy. In this article, I seek to reorient our understanding of the histories that underpin theories of capitalism to be inclusive of colonial relations and for the framework of analysis to be transformed by their appropriate consideration.

Referenced In