Journal Article 1 Mention
Cancer risks from cosmic radiation exposure in flight: A review
Christopher Scheibler2022
Sneh M. TopraniIrina Mordukhovich
Top 4% · 96th Percentile
39 citations · Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Open Access

TLDR

People who work on airplanes are exposed to more space radiation than most others, and some types of cancer are more common in these workers, but it's still unclear if the radiation is the main cause because many other factors could also play a role.

Summary

1 Study Aim

The review aims to summarize and analyze all available research up to 2021 on cancer risks in airline crew members, focusing on their exposure to cosmic ionizing radiation (CIR), which comes from space and the sun. The authors seek to clarify which cancers are more common in aircrew, explore whether CIR is responsible, and highlight the difficulties in separating the effects of CIR from other job-related exposures. The review also identifies gaps and challenges in current research to guide future studies and improve health protections for aircrew and frequent flyers. The review looks at whether working on airplanes increases cancer risk because of space radiation, and what makes it hard to study this.

2 Study Design

This is a comprehensive literature review that examines all epidemiological studies published through 2021 about cancer in airline crew exposed to cosmic ionizing radiation (CIR). The authors focus on studies that look at cancer rates and deaths among pilots and flight attendants, using both direct measurements and estimates of CIR exposure. They analyze large cohort studies from Europe and the U.S., as well as meta-analyses, and compare findings for different types of cancer. The review also discusses how studies measure exposure, the types of data used, and the strengths and weaknesses of different research methods. The authors read and compare many past studies about cancer in airline workers, looking at how these studies measured radiation exposure and cancer cases.

3 Findings

The review finds that airline crew have higher rates of certain cancers, such as melanoma (a type of skin cancer), non-melanoma skin cancer, and breast cancer in female flight attendants, compared to the general population. However, the evidence does not clearly prove that cosmic ionizing radiation (CIR) is the direct cause, because other factors like disrupted sleep patterns, lifestyle, and past exposures (such as secondhand smoke) also affect cancer risk. Some studies show a possible link between CIR and cancer risk, especially for skin cancers, but results are inconsistent for other cancers like prostate, thyroid, leukemia, and brain cancer. The review highlights major challenges in measuring CIR exposure accurately and controlling for confounding factors. The authors recommend better exposure tracking, more detailed studies, and updated health guidelines as air travel and CIR exposure are expected to increase in the future. Some cancers are more common in airline workers, but it's hard to know if space radiation is the main reason because many other things could also cause these cancers.

Abstract

Aircrew (consisting of flight attendants, pilots, or flight engineers/navigators) are exposed to cosmic ionizing radiation (CIR) at flight altitude, which originates from solar activity and galactic sources. These exposures accumulate over time and are considerably higher for aircrew compared to the general population, and even higher compared to U.S. radiation workers. Many epidemiological studies on aircrew have observed higher rates of specific cancers compared to the general population. Despite high levels of CIR exposure and elevated rates of cancer in aircrew, a causal link between CIR and cancer has yet to be established. Many challenges still exist in effectively studying this relationship, not the least of which is evaluating CIR exposure separately from the constellation of factors that occur as part of the flight environment. This review concentrates on cancer incidence and mortality observed among aircrew in epidemiologic studies in relation to CIR exposure and limitation trends observed across the literature. The aim of this review is to provide an updated comprehensive summary of the literature that will support future research by identifying epidemiological challenges and highlighting existing increased cancer concerns in an occupation where CIR exposure is anticipated to increase in the future.

Referenced In