Popular Boards
David Oelen, Pascal Kaiser, Thomas Baumann | Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound | (2020)
Abstract
The accuracy of physicians in their daily routine is inferior to deep learning-based algorithms for determining angles in ultrasound of the newborn hip. Similar methods could be used to support physicians.
Tags
Sample Definition And Size
The study used 303,306 ultrasound images of newborn hips collected between 2009 and 2016 during screening consultations. Trained physicians labeled every second image with alpha and beta angles during routine consultations. A random subset of images was labeled under laboratory conditions with time and precision to serve as ground truth. The analysis focused on the alpha angle. ([thieme-connect.de](https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/all/doi/10.1055/a-1177-0480?utm_source=openai))
Study Type
This was an observational study comparing human performance (trained physicians) to automated methods (deep learning-based convolutional neural networks) in measuring angles in ultrasound images. Three CNN-based methods were implemented: (1) direct angle prediction, (2) landmark detection, and (3) detection of baseline and roof lines for angle calculation. ([thieme-connect.de](https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/all/doi/10.1055/a-1177-0480?utm_source=openai))
Conflicts Of Interest
No conflicts of interest are declared in the accessible abstract or metadata. ([thieme-connect.de](https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/all/doi/10.1055/a-1177-0480?utm_source=openai))
Results Summary
The root mean squared error (RMSE) between physicians’ measurements and ground truth for the alpha angle was 7.1°. The best-performing CNN method (landmark detection) achieved an RMSE of 3.9° for the alpha angle. ([thieme-connect.de](https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/all/doi/10.1055/a-1177-0480?utm_source=openai))
Referenced In
Created: Apr 11, 2026