Summary
This content was automatically synthesized by Credo's AI models directly from the original source text.
AI summaries can make mistakes — double-check important details against the original source.
1 Sample Definition And Size
The systematic literature review (SLR) focused on non‑invasive visual evoked potential (P300, SSVEP, or hybrid) based brain‑computer interface (BCI) systems applied to motor rehabilitation. From an initial pool of 3,691 records identified across multiple databases, 1,388 articles published after 2011 were screened; 1,269 were excluded for not involving actual applications, 392 were for spelling, and 175 for other control tasks, leaving 107 focused on motor rehabilitation. After quality screening, 34 articles were selected for detailed analysis.
2 Study Type
Systematic literature review following PRISMA methodology, covering studies up to June 2021, with inclusion/exclusion criteria applied across identification, screening, and inclusion phases.
3 Conflicts Of Interest
No conflicts of interest are declared in the paper.
4 Results Summary
Of the 34 included studies, 26.47% (9) used P300, 55.8% (19) used SSVEP, and 17.64% (6) used hybrid modalities. Applications were categorized as FES (17.64%), VR (23.52%), Orthosis (29.41%), Prosthesis/Exoskeleton (11.76%), and Robotic Rehabilitation Systems (17.64%). Only four studies involved patient testing. The most common classifiers were LDA (48.64%) and SVM (16.21%); only one study used a CNN (deep learning). Reported accuracies ranged from 38.02% to 100%, and information transfer rates (ITR) ranged from 1.55 to 49.25 bits per minute. LDA was the most used algorithm; CNN showed promise but was limited by technical complexity.