Popular Boards

S. W. Hawking | Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields | (1976)

Abstract

The principle of equivalence, which says that gravity couples to the energy-momentum tensor of matter, and the quantum-mechanical requirement that energy should be positive imply that gravity is always attractive. This leads to singularities in any reasonable theory of gravitation. A singularity is a place where the classical concepts of space and time break down as do all the known laws of physics because they are all formulated on a classical space-time background. In this paper it is claimed that this breakdown is not merely a result of our ignorance of the correct theory but that it represents a fundamental limitation to our ability to predict the future, a limitation that is analogous but additional to the limitation imposed by the normal quantum-mechanical uncertainty principle. The new limitation arises because general relativity allows the causal structure of space-time to be very different from that of Minkowski space. The interaction region can be bounded not only by an initial surface on which data are given and a final surface on which measurements are made but also a "hidden surface" about which the observer has only limited information such as the mass, angular momentum, and charge. Concerning this hidden surface one has a "principle of ignorance": The surface emits with equal probability all configurations of particles compatible with the observers limited knowledge. It is shown that the ignorance principle holds for the quantum-mechanical evaporation of black holes: The black hole creates particles in pairs, with one particle always falling into the hole and the other possibly escaping to infinity. Because part of the information about the state of the system is lost down the hole, the final situation is represented by a density matrix rather than a pure quantum state. This means there is no $S$ matrix for the process of black-hole formation and evaporation. Instead one has to introduce a new operator, called the superscattering operator, which maps density matrices describing the initial situation to density matrices describing the final situation.

Tags

Sample Definition And Size

The paper is a theoretical analysis by a single author (S. W. Hawking) and does not involve empirical data or a sample size. It is not a meta-analysis or review of multiple studies.

Study Type

The work is a theoretical physics paper, presenting conceptual and mathematical arguments regarding gravitational collapse, singularities, and quantum-mechanical limitations on predictability.

Conflicts Of Interest

No conflicts of interest are declared in the paper. As a theoretical physics article published in 1976, standard conflict-of-interest disclosures were not customary, and none are indicated in the available metadata.

Results Summary

Hawking argues that gravitational collapse leads to singularities where classical space-time and physical laws break down, imposing a fundamental limitation on predictability beyond quantum uncertainty. He introduces the concept of a “hidden surface” and a “principle of ignorance,” whereby observers have limited information (mass, angular momentum, charge) and must assign equal probability to all compatible particle configurations. Applied to black hole evaporation, this leads to loss of information into the black hole, resulting in a final state described by a density matrix rather than a pure quantum state. Consequently, there is no conventional S‑matrix for black hole formation and evaporation; instead, Hawking proposes a “superscattering operator” that maps initial density matrices to final ones. (No numerical statistics such as p‑values or confidence intervals are applicable.)

Referenced In

Season 17, Episode 6: The Black Hole Information Paradox Explained

Hey StarTalkians! In Season 17, Episode 6, Neil and Chuck tackle another collection of Cosmic Queries, with a focus on black holes. One question they received touched the black hole information paradox. 

Incoming Asteroids, Moving Black Holes, & More! | Cosmic Queries #104

The Queries episodes are great for covering a lot of ground, but it’s easy to get a little lost during the brief explanations. Neil covered the main points broadly, but here’s a more detailed explanation.

Hawking Radiation and Information in a Black Hole

Stephen Hawking made a huge stir in the 1970s with his research on how quantum mechanics works on the edge of a black hole (Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse).

The basic idea depends on pair production. It’s like the universe has an energy bank account and after a quick loan, a pair of one particle and one anti-particle can emerge. But that loan has to be paid back: they combine, annihilate and the energy debt is repaid.

Hawking wondered, what happens if this happens on the very edge of a black hole? One particle might fall in while the other escapes into space.

If this happens, who pays the energy debt? The black hole. He concluded that black holes must evaporate by emitting radiation – called Hawking radiation – to repay this debt.

The problem is that you can’t get the original particle’s information from the radiation that comes out. It’s like trying to reconstruct an ancient stone by studying the grains of sand on the beach.

But if the information is lost, it’s not possible to determine what happened in the past by studying the present. It throws the whole project of physics into question.

The Black Hole Information Paradox

Hawking’s student, Don Page, came back in the 1990s with an ingenious insight (Information in black hole radiation). He realized that the radiation would carry information from the black hole via quantum entanglement.

Page showed that the “entanglement entropy” – the information contained in the entangled state – would increase as the black hole evaporated, but would decline back to zero as the black hole disappears.

The only problem is that nobody knew how the entropy trend could just reverse like this. Physicists were left with a paradox: either weird new physics was needed way sooner than expected, or Hawking was right and information is lost forever.

0