logologo

Popular Boards

1 Mentions
Michel Devoret, John M. Martinis, John Clarke | Physical Review Letters | (1985)
Primary Link Pubmed DOI Openalex

Abstract

The escape rate of an underdamped ($Q\ensuremath{\approx}30$), current-biased Josephson junction from the zero-voltage state has been measured. The relevant parameters of the junction were determined in situ in the thermal regime from the dependence of the escape rate on bias current and from resonant activation in the presence of microwaves. At low temperatures, the escape rate became independent of temperature with a value that, with no adjustable parameters, was in excellent agreement with the zero-temperature prediction for macroscopic quantum tunneling.

Tags

Sample Definition And Size

The study investigated an underdamped (quality factor Q ≈ 30) current‑biased Josephson junction. The sample size refers to the single junction studied; no meta‑analysis or multiple samples were reported.

Study Type

Experimental observational study measuring the escape rate from the zero‑voltage state of a Josephson junction, comparing thermal activation and macroscopic quantum tunneling regimes.

Conflicts Of Interest

No conflicts of interest are declared in the available metadata.

Results Summary

The escape rate of the underdamped Josephson junction was measured as a function of bias current and via resonant activation with microwaves in the thermal regime. At low temperatures, the escape rate became temperature‑independent and matched the zero‑temperature theoretical prediction for macroscopic quantum tunneling with no adjustable parameters.

Referenced In

StarTalk

Season 17, Episode 1: Understanding Macroscopic Quantum Tunnelling

Hey StarTalkers! The first episode of Season 17 saw Neil, Chuck and guest Professor John Martinis sit down to discuss superconductivity, quantum mechanics and quantum computing.

An Interview with the Winner of the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics, John Martinis

For the initiated, the phrase “macroscopic quantum tunnelling” invokes a strange mixture of awe and fear. It’s the weirdness of the quantum world encroaching into our reality, like a virus reaching up from the deepest recesses of existence.

If you’re not sure why this was impactful enough to win Professor Martinis the 2025 Nobel Prize in physics, this post is for you. 

Quantum Tunnelling Explained

Quantum tunnelling basically means “very small objects getting to places they shouldn’t be able to reach.”

Imagine a ball rolling towards a hill. The hill is a potential energy barrier. It basically says “you need this many joules to cross.” If the ball has enough kinetic energy, it clears the hill. If not, it rolls back down.

But for analogous barriers in the quantum world, there is a probability that the particle appears on the other side even if it doesn’t seem to have enough energy.

Superconducting Circuits as Macroscopic Quantum Systems

So how could this happen at the macroscopic level? Professor Martinis’ team published a paper showing the key insight in 1985.

Using a Josephson junction – like a tiny, electric potential-based “hill” – they were able to show “quantization” in macroscopic superconducting systems (see image below).

How? Well, electrons in superconductors form “Cooper pairs,” which have a composite wavefunction. They behave as one quantum object. Professor Martinis describes this at 9:55 in the podcast. The team were able to create this behaviour in a many-particle system.

The Macroscopic Quantum Tunnelling Proof

The team’s follow-up paper proved that the voltage across the Josephson junction (the effect of the electron going over the “hill”) was not caused by heat energy.

The math shows that temperature isn’t relevant for quantum tunnelling. And sure enough, when they reduced the temperature below 25 mK (milli-Kelvin), the escape rate didn’t vary with temperature. This proved without a doubt that the effect was quantum tunnelling.

It’s like that slow-rolling ball just appeared on the other side of the hill. 

Read Full Post
5